Hanafi, Lisca Aulia (2025) Code Switching and Code Mixing in EFL Classroom Presentations: Case Study at the English Education Department. Diploma atau S1 thesis, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten.

	Teks S_TBI_211230103_Cover.pdf Download (134kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_Lampiran Depan.pdf Download (589kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_BAB I.pdf Download (431kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_BAB II.pdf Restricted to Hanya staf repositori Download (391kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_BAB III.pdf Restricted to Hanya staf repositori Download (359kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Hanya staf repositori Download (1MB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_BAB V.pdf Download (209kB)
	Teks S_TBI_211230103_Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (461kB)

Abstrak

This study aimed to examine the types and communicative functions of code-switching and code-mixing used by EFL students during classroom presentations, along with their communicative goals in applying these bilingual strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive case study, data were gathered through classroom observations, documentation, and semi structured interviews with fourth-semester students of the English Education Department at UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten. The findings revealed 117 utterances containing code-switching and code-mixing. Three types of code-switching were identified: inter-sentential switching 30, intra sentential switching 24, and tag switching 11 utterances. three types of code mixing were found: insertion 48, alternation 4, and congruent lexicalization 0 utterances. Among these, intra-sentential switching and insertion mixing were the most dominant, Inter-sentential switching was dominant because students prepared their presentation scripts beforehand, allowing them to plan language shifts between sentences more naturally. Insertion mixing frequently appeared since English terms were familiar and commonly used in academic settings, making communication more efficient. In terms of communicative functions, six major functions were identified based on Appel and Muysken’s framework: referential 71 utterance, directive 17, expressive 5, phatic 12, metalinguistic 11, and poetic 1 utterance. The referential function was the most frequent, as students often switched or mixed languages to explain academic concepts and theories for better audience understanding, indicating that language was mainly used to convey information more clearly and to manage the flow of presentation. The interview results showed that students used language alternation to improve clarity, manage nervousness, enhance confidence, and engage the audience. They considered these bilingual practices effective for supporting comprehension and interactive learning environment. For the next researchers, it is encouraged to explore code-switching and code-mixing for the improvement of communication in different academic settings.

Tipe Item/Data:	Skripsi/Tesis/Disertasi (Diploma atau S1)
Kata Kunci (keywords):	Code Switching, Code Mixing, EFL
Subjek:	400 Bahasa > 420 Bahasa Inggris & bahasa Inggris Kuno > 425 tata bahasa Inggris
Divisi:	Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan > Tadris Bahasa Inggris
User Penyetor:	S.Hum Prihantini Noor Akmalia
Tanggal Disetorkan:	05 Mei 2026 07:41
Perubahan Terakhir:	05 Mei 2026 08:03
URI:	http://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/id/eprint/18576

Actions (login required)

Lihat Item